<@U3T6LDWTD> Nice. I wouldn't be against a syntax ...
# language-proposalsa
aerb
05/30/2017, 12:54 AM@benleggiero Nice. I wouldn't be against a syntax to bind the property to a different name, but I'm actually more interested in the immutability, than the nullability. It would be nice to have a convenient syntax that lets you treat a mutable property as an immutible one in a given scope. I find this want a lot in Android, where I like to lazily build views.