Join Slack
Powered by
You really need support for union types to type-ch...
# language-proposals
e
elizarov
03/06/2017, 4:56 AM
You really need support for
union types
to type-check this kind of code. Look at how many things inside
kotlinx.coroutines
are implemented, for example. It has more complex unions than just
UNINITIALIZED_VALUE | T
union that is used in`lazy`.
Open in Slack
Previous
Next