Join Slack
Powered by
no it’s not. if you declare a Kotlin method that t...
# language-proposals
y
yole
05/10/2016, 3:23 PM
no it’s not. if you declare a Kotlin method that takes a union type as a parameter, and it’s visible for Java as a java.lang.Object where it’s up to you to figure out what you can pass to it, that is not good enough
Open in Slack
Previous
Next