Join Slack
Powered by
Digging a little more: there's implicit conversion...
# language-proposals
f
fellshard
03/26/2016, 6:47 AM
Digging a little more: there's implicit conversion when used in numeric operations. I'd expect that - because it's not an inheritance-based hierarchy - each Number type needs to explicitly dictate the conversions on a per-operator/param-type basis.
Open in Slack
Previous
Next