<@U092N7GGG>: the same could be argued about javad...
# dokka
j
@yole: the same could be argued about javadoc, and yes some people found it a good idea to publish them. There are valid reasons. Having the javadoc/dokka doc online isn’t always such an easy option and requires more work. Many libraries (even very popular ones like for example http://ant.apache.org/manual/api/) don’t have one online, or only have the latest version javadoc. I guess some people also like to have it offline, for various reason (flaky internet, work on a train/plane, etc.). Anyway, if I have to publish javadoc anyway, it feels natural to me to also publish the dokka doc. One thing that the source code doesn’t necessarily have, BTW, is style or content that would be added by a custom doclet or external tool (like https://www.yworks.com/resources/yDoc/doc/DocFilter.html, for a random example).