<@U0F3291QE> for #514, maybe we should hear more a...

# tornadofx

[carlw]

@edvin for #514, maybe we should hear more about the use case. IMHO, i'd keep the tornadofx API in line with the javafx docs. ex, don't make "success" run off the UI thread and go against the docs. there are a lot of plain Java threading constructs that don't involve JavaFX if the OP wants to keep stuff off the JavaFX thread