<@U25U0KPFT> We already require headless JavaFX su...

# tornadofx

[edvin]

@carlw We already require headless JavaFX support (and it works great) in our tests, and I'm not sure how I could "push it to the receiver" as you say - I want this to be handled by the framework, so if you have "configured" your events correctly, you don't need to care about what thread you're on, it will just work. That was my thought at least.