Here, if the coroutine is cancelled, `a.await` or ...

# coroutines

[Jonathan]

Here, if the coroutine is cancelled, a.await or b.await would throw a CancellationException, but the actual jobs a and b wouldn't be canceled. Of course this could be handled with a try-catch around the await, and explicitly cancelling the jobs. But is there a nicer way to handler it?

How_to_make_jobs_started_in_a_suspending_function__children_of_the_current_coroutine__.kt