If you really need that 2nd constructor I m guessing Java in kotlinlang #codingconventions

If you really need that 2nd constructor (I'm guess...

mg6maciej

06/10/2017, 7:39 AM

If you really need that 2nd constructor (I'm guessing Java interop?) then I would definitely leave the same names and to make it compile add

this(id = null,

. Nevertheless this is really confusing and I'd try to avoid that secondary constructor.