the naming convention exists because tests don’t i...
# failgood
c
the naming convention exists because tests don’t implement an interface, so i need something to at least find candidates for tests. And the
@Test
annotation is just for junit. I think this part of failgood needs to change but I’m not sure how. with the naming convention its possible to just put your tests into a kotlin class like
Copy code
val tests = describe("...") {}