Using `atomicfu` , with the following block of cod...

# multiplatform

[Edoardo Luppi]

Using atomicfu , with the following block of code:

private val lock = SynchronizedObject()
...

public actual override fun use(instance: T) {
  synchronized(lock) {
    doSomething(instance)
  }
}

What happens if doSomething is a suspendable function?
Is this a use-case that I can handle somehow?

[Jeff Lockhart]

You could use reentrantLock() instead:

val lock = reentrantLock()
lock.lock()
doSuspendSomething()
lock.unlock()

[Jeff Lockhart]

SynchronizedObject() also supports manually calling lock() and unlock() too.

[Edoardo Luppi]

Thanks @Jeff Lockhart, I was mainly wondering if a suspension point in the middle of a lock could cause some kind of undefined behavior

[Jeff Lockhart]

There's nothing wrong with locking and unlocking the lock from different threads. A thread that is waiting on the lock will block until it's unlocked, so you'd just want to be sure there's not a lot of threads blocking waiting on the lock, otherwise it may make sense to use a suspending, rather than blocking, alternative, like Mutex.