Always a bit annoying to have to slap `@Suppress("...

# compose

[Stylianos Gakis]

Always a bit annoying to have to slap @Suppress("UnusedReceiverParameter") on top of a composable which I want to be able to emit multiple things inside a column or a row, so I make them extensions on ColumnScope/RowScope, but I am not using that scope in any other way so the code thinks the scope is unused.
Is there anything I am missing to make my life a bit easier here?
I feel like for Composables in particular, this warning is wrong, as if I am emitting more than 1 composable top-level, then I am actually making use of the scope, despite what the warning says.

[MR3Y]

Maybe there is a way to suppress this warning at the module level?

[Stylianos Gakis]

No because I'd be suppressing all cases of scope being unused, and it's a very good warning in all cases but these specific ones.

[MR3Y]

Valid point. yeah, I think we need an exclusion for the composables here. but, I can't think of a good way to do this.

[Stylianos Gakis]

Me neither

[shikasd]

Well, technically you are not using the scope, unless you use it for compile time checks.

[Stylianos Gakis]

I would argue I am in a way using the scope in the sense that I make it impossible to call this composable from other places where this scope isn't there.
Also I avoid problems like getting different outcomes from calling it from one call site without the scope vs another call site with a different scope.
I know I am not using the scope in the terms that you describe, but the scope being there really is a very meaningful thing.

[shikasd]

Yeah, that's what I meant by compile-time checks :)