Strike number two. :face_with_rolling_eyes:
# meta
s
Strike number two. 🙄
3
h
This at least qualifies as an article, so I'd probably think it's OK in #feed 🤷‍♂️ (contrary to the first one, which was literally just an ad for his training)
The user shared some blogs with partial content of the training he is offering and links to that. I’m totally fine with that. But direct advertisement of the training or „challenges“ is nothing I want to see in #feed.
#feed holds a special place for me because I pay closer attention to this channel than the others.
m
I intentionally included on solution in the post, so it is not too easy, would you prefer if solution were added?
s
I would prefer to keep advertisments out of #feed. Please sell your courses somewhere else.
m
I might not post challenges here, they were posted because I consider them valuable for those who want to practice functional collection processing.
s
I feel that #feed is not the place for that. In my view its for blog posts, library (update) announcements and the like. There might be a place for challenges with solutions in paid courses/books, but that's not #feed.
m
As I wrote already, I added solutions to all three articles with exercises and I will not publish any other exercises if it causes mixed feelings.
👍 2