<@UHAJKUSTU> Since sample apps use Reaktive, I don...

# decompose

[electrolobzik]

@Arkadii Ivanov Since sample apps use Reaktive, I don’t fully understand what is the recommended approach for passing the output of the component. For example if I specify the component this way:

[electrolobzik]

I have to call emit from a coroutine context/suspend function. Which probably is not desired. On the other hand I can replace all outputs with lambda-parameters, which can look heavy with a lot of them.

[electrolobzik]

Or should I use a single lambda with only Output parameter?

[Arkadii Ivanov]

You can call tryEmit instead, which doesn't require a coroutine context.

[Arkadii Ivanov]

In this case you can either pass output: (Output) -> Unit, or separate callbacks per output kind.

[Arkadii Ivanov]

I would use separate callbacks personally.

[electrolobzik]

Could you please advise what are the benefits of using Flow in this case instead of regular callback-lambdas? In what case it could be useful?

[electrolobzik]

In the sample Consumer is used. I suppose it should make some sense.

[Arkadii Ivanov]

You can pass Flow to a component to allow it receiving events (inputs), or pass StateFlow for states. You can pass a callback (or a number of callbacks) for outputs.

[Arkadii Ivanov]

Yes, because Reaktive has Consumer type. A normal callback could be used instead.

[Arkadii Ivanov]

Just use normal callbacks as it's a general practice.

[electrolobzik]

Yeah, I tried to mimic the Reactive sample first and then asked myself what are the benefits and was not able to figure out some. Thank you for advise!