Is it expected (no pun intended) that when running...

# ksp

[eygraber]

Is it expected (no pun intended) that when running KSP on a non common compilation that has a class with an actual modifier, that KsClassDeclaration.isActual will return false?

[Jiaxiang]

no, if the class is declared in source of the build unit, KSP only checks for keywords (actual) on the declaration to determine if it is actual.

[eygraber]

So if there is an actual keyword, KSP should return true?

[Jiaxiang]

yes

[eygraber]

OK I'll play around a little more just to make sure I'm not doing something wrong, and then I'll file an issue

[Jiaxiang]

you can post here before filing an issue so I can take a look to see if there is other reason for the mismatch.

[eygraber]

There is a level of indirection in the code so it's hard to post it, but the gist is that I'm getting a KSValueParameter from a KSFunctionDeclaration.parameters and then calling (type.declaration as KSClassDeclaration).isActual

[Jiaxiang]

I see, is the type.declaration a declaration in the source or library?

[eygraber]

It's in a library. However if I get the KSClassDeclaration of type.declaration directly using an annotation, then isActual is true even though the declaration is still from a library.

[Jiaxiang]

I see, please file an issue for further investigation.

[eygraber]

False alarm, KSP was running for the library as well, and that was what was seeing isActual as true.