Ray Rahke
03/17/2024, 3:09 AMThread.sleep(1000)
which seems to do nothing. Is there no simple time.sleep()
equivalent?Vampire
03/17/2024, 3:56 AMThread.sleep
is in 98.7 % of cases where you are tempted to use it the wrong thing. But indeed it does not do nothing, but blocks the current thread for 1 second.CLOVIS
03/17/2024, 4:19 PMtime.sleep()
does in Python, so we're going to need more information to know what you're expecting different)