This is super interesting. I'm generating an addit...

# compiler

[ansman]

This is super interesting. I'm generating an additional copy function for a data class. I'm not adding a body but one seems to be generated by itself. Is that expected?

[ansman]

Even generating my own body doesnt work. Renaming it to copy2 works though

[Javier]

if it has the same amount of arguments with the same names I think it is expected

[ansman]

It does not, it has fewer

[ansman]

But each argument has the same name and type as one of the primary constructor

[Javier]

But the copy function has the same params as the primary one, no/

[ansman]

Not in quantity

[ansman]

It will contain a subset of the primary copy function

[ansman]

So after looking through the code it seems that if the backend encounters a copy function without a body, it will generate one. To make matters worse it overwrites the origin so my extension didn't handle it. Luckily you can get around this by generating a dummy body