Is there any reason why things like an unused loca...

# compiler

[kevin.cianfarini]

Is there any reason why things like an unused local variable and an unused function are warnings in the IDE but not in the compiler?

[kevin.cianfarini]

For context, I spent a bit trying to enable allWarningsAsErrors = true and it kept successfully building when I had intentionally added an unused variable. I found this surprising.

[evanchooly]

my WAG is that not all warnings are created equally. an unused function might be called via reflection or, in the case of $dayJob, generated bytecode added during class instrumentation. as such, it can be difficult to definitively flag something as truly unused.

[evanchooly]

but it's probably a bug. 😄

[kevin.cianfarini]

In both of those cases it seems like those warnings should be manually suppressed with a comment explaining that, then?

[evanchooly]

agreed 100%

[kevin.cianfarini]

I did just recently update my project to Kotlin 2.0.0 compiler, I wonder if it’s a bug there.

[ephemient]

it's fine if the IDE inspections are slow or occasionally flaky, but the compiler should work the same way every time it is invoked. so I believe warnings that are more expensive to compute will not be in the compiler

[ephemient]

unused local and private are probably easy, but "unused" in general requires seeing the whole project at once. so I guess they maybe don't introduce it in the compiler since it's covered more comprehensively in the IDE anyway?