is there a difference between anonymous function ```val a = fun (): String { return "" } or val...

# getting-started

[janvladimirmostert]

is there a difference between

anonymous function

val a = fun (): String {
   return ""
}
or 
val a = fun () = ""

and lambda expression

val b: () -> String = {
   ""
}
or
val b = { "" }

in any way other than just the syntax?

[Raymond]

They have a difference that can’t noticed in your snippet. Lambdas cannot return locally unless inlined, whereas anonymous function do return locally.

You can check the behavior on this sample: https://github.com/rayarteagas/Functional-programming-with-kotlin-talk/blob/main/src/main/kotlin/LambdasAndAnonymousFunctions.kt

[dmitriy.novozhilov]

If function is not inlined then local return is prohibited (unless function is inlined). But the thing is that return in lambdas and functions means different things:

fun test(b: Boolean) { // (1)
    val function = fun () { // (2)
        if (b) return // return from (2), allowed
        if (b) return@test // return from (1), prohibited
    }

    val lambda: () -> Unit = l@{ // (3)
        if (b) return // return from (1), prohibited
        if (b) return@l // return from (3), allowed
    }
}

[Zinedine Bedrani]

@janvladimirmostert Another thing is with anonymous functions you can have multiple returns 👍

[janvladimirmostert]

how does one do multiple returns with an anonymous function other than Pair or Triple or a data class?

[Zinedine Bedrani]

Wait, I think there is a misunderstanding, what I meant with anonymous functions you can have “Multiple return points” is that you can do something like:

val a = fun(str:String):String {
if(str.isEmpty())
return "String is empty"
else return str
}

But with lambda expression you can’t do that.

correct me if I’m wrong please 🙏

[janvladimirmostert]

you can definitely do it with lambdas too

val l: (String) -> String = lambda@{ param: String ->
   if (param.isEmpty()) {
      return@lambda "String is empty"
   } else {
      return@lambda param
   }
}

or you can omit the lambda@ and then omit the return@lambda and it will also return and you can also omit the (String) -> String since that's implied

[Zinedine Bedrani]

This is because you’re using labels 😁 but if you don’t use it, compiler will tells you that return is not allowed here, am I wrong ? 😁

[janvladimirmostert]

you don't need a return to return something

val s: String = {
   if (a) {
       "string1"
    } else {
       "string2"
    }
}

s will contain either string1 or string2 depending on whether a is true or false