:sad-panda: Can't have these two signatures in t...

# getting-started

[Daniel Pitts]

sad panda Can't have these two signatures in the same interface, despite being able to in a class.

class A
class B

interface Broken {
    //  @JvmName("runA") // annotation is not applicable to this declaration.
    fun run(collection: Collection<A>)
    fun run(collection: Collection<B>)  // Platform declaration clash: The following declarations have the same JVM signature
}

[Youssef Shoaib [MOD]]

You can just suppress the @JvmName error. Sadly I don't know of a better fix

[Youssef Shoaib [MOD]]

Oh, you could have one of the methods take an extra unit: Unit = Unit parameter

[Daniel Pitts]

Didn’t know you could suppress errors.

[Daniel Pitts]

Hmm, that might work. Still hacky though.

[CLOVIS]

You can just suppress the @JvmName error. Sadly I don't know of a better fix

IIRC that's dangerous because the annotation isn't inherited, so you have to manually put it in all implementations. It makes it easy to forget overrides

[dmitriy.novozhilov]

> Didn’t know you could suppress errors.
Please don't. There are no guarantees for the compiler behavior if you suppress an error

[Daniel Pitts]

lol. I know. I just ended up renaming one of the methods to avoid this. It’s unfortunate that it’s necessary, but it is.