Well they still want the production Play Store des...
# compose-wear
t
Well they still want the production Play Store description mentioning Wear OS to open a beta track and have users complains, but now they even enforce that's it's present in all the translations. Sorry not compose but need to vent a little as the coming week of rejections won't be fun.
๐Ÿ˜ž 3
l
I don't understand why they want us to mention "Wear OS" in the listings when the Play Store already has all the metadata it needs!
t
And also companion app if it's a companion, despite the data also being available ... And why prod rules for beta track when there's no beta play store description, and so many questions about Wear that makes no sense and bots on the other side that never answers ๐Ÿ˜ž
My other app does only have wear Os in the English description, so I guess it's a matter of time before a random rejection about that when updating the main app.
l
At times, it feels like Human Intelligence has long been gone at Google ๐Ÿ˜…
t
At Play Store ๐Ÿ˜› There's still guys like Yuri at Google ๐Ÿ˜›
l
Of course, we're thankful to have Yuri
And several other folks
m
in mi case, its a standalone wearos app, but, in fact, when uploading, the console alerts about the application id, do you know about how to configure the wearos app module for using the same application id similar to the mobile app module and the app bundles being published in the playstore console? ๐Ÿ˜ž
t
If you need both apps with the same ID then you need to use the Wear OS track. Not upload a new different app.
๐Ÿ™Œ 1
m
@Tolriq at this moment, im uploading the mobile app, how to use the wearos track?
l
I also have an issue making 1 app + 1 wearos. Then develop many whitelabel apps from the core app. It will not work because it is different from the applicationID.
So I appealed to see if there're still robots on the other side unable to answer any question or read the actual appeal message. And still the case :( Ask questions and all I get is your app is still not compliant with an automated answer that does not answer the question or anything from the appeal. This is disgusting.
๐Ÿ˜ฐ 1