as an implementation dependency instead of slf4j? This causes issue when we need slf4j-simple for common jvm tests but throws the following warning.
Copy code
CommonTest[jvm] > httpClient()[jvm] STANDARD_ERROR
SLF4J(W): Class path contains multiple SLF4J providers.
SLF4J(W): Found provider [org.slf4j.simple.SimpleServiceProvider@7adfe306]
SLF4J(W): Found provider [ch.qos.logback.classic.spi.LogbackServiceProvider@7b0453f4]
SLF4J(W): See <https://www.slf4j.org/codes.html#multiple_bindings> for an explanation.
SLF4J(I): Connected with provider of type [org.slf4j.simple.SimpleServiceProvider]
➕ 1
a
Aleksei Tirman [JB]
07/30/2024, 7:15 PM
Can you tell me why you need to use this artifact?
☝️ 1
e
ephemient
07/30/2024, 8:57 PM
as I mentioned in the other thread, it seems to be setup for tests inside the ktor repo
ephemient
07/30/2024, 8:59 PM
in that usage, it makes sense to pull in logback-classic - it's a leaf node, not a library