Google keeps rejecting my in-app subscription payw...
# android
u
Google keeps rejecting my in-app subscription paywall even though I have not changed anything since the first version. I am using RevenueCat's built-in paywall and the reason of the rejection is: • Your offer doesn’t clearly describe the terms of your subscription or the cancellation terms are not found on the subscription page. You can refer to the attached screenshot for additional information. They also attached the screenshot. I don't know what is wrong with the paywall. Paywall does say the trial period and what happens after that(period and price). What else do they want?
not kotlin but kotlin colored 8
k
I guess cancellation terms is missing. Example cancellation terms : Subscription automatically renews unless canceled. You can cancel your subscription in your Google Play account settings at any time.
🙌 3
u
So RevenueCat is completely failing on this. Isn't it a bit weird since it'is used by so many people and organizations.
u
Yea, I just saw that. Suggestion is very professional. Just resubmit. 😅
😅 1
Thank you tho
k
fist bump
🙌 1
u
I added a text to the package features. Maybe it can help.
k
I think it should work maybe just improve the wording
u
Claude did the wording. 🥶
1
m
Also make sure that you test using Play Console Billing lab to check how your users in other countries will see the paywall and make sure the Google Pay dialog shows the same info you are showing in the previous screen.
I'm saying this because we had the same rejection issue, and turns out that India could not have autorenewing subscriptions above 5000INR (from memory), which meant that we were saying the subscription was autorenewing Yearly but in reality it was 1-off payment with 1 year access.
I believe this has recently changed again because we started having rejections the other way around, and now checking the billing lab app I can see that Indian users get offered the standard yearly autorenewing
u
Thank you for the tips. Those all good but Google really need to be more specific with this rejection and share some examples. They just say its wrong and fix it.