```sealed interface EmptyResult { object Succe...

# getting-started

[oday]

sealed interface EmptyResult {
    object Success : EmptyResult
    class Failure(val error: Throwable) : EmptyResult
}

sealed class DeleteResult : EmptyResult
sealed class SetResult : EmptyResult

Why can’t I access SetResult.Success or DeleteResult.Success?

[oday]

I want both of those classes to have those object and class available to them, so I can write 1 method that does something to both, this method

inline fun EmptyResult.fold(
    onSuccess: () -> Unit,
    onFailure: (exception: Throwable) -> Unit,
): Unit = when (this) {
    is EmptyResult.Success -> onSuccess()
    is EmptyResult.Failure -> onFailure(error)
}

[oday]

the method is available though

[Youssef Shoaib [MOD]]

I think what you want is a typealias instead:

typealias DeleteResult = EmptyResult

[oday]

Hmm

[Klitos Kyriacou]

It seems you want all classes that implement the EmptyResult interface to also have their own separate Success and Failure subclasses. That's not what you have though. The classes Success and Failure and also DeleteResult and SetResult are all directly implementing EmptyResult.

[oday]

Right

[oday]

Yes Klitos

[oday]

That's what I want indeed

[Stephan Schroeder]

so the general concept is working, see https://pl.kotl.in/FOulfIFbG
But the classes DeleteResult and SetResult seem confused. First you define subtypes of EmptyResult within the body, then outside of it, which isn't wrong but maybe not what you intended. Success and Failure aren't properties of EmptyResult but subtypes.
It's also strange that DeleteResult and SetResult are sealed classes, because you can't instanciate those. You'd have to create subtypes to those as well, which is probably not what you've intended.

[Klitos Kyriacou]

Youssef's idea of typealias DeleteResult = EmptyResult would work, but there would be no type safety to prevent a DeleteResult being assigned to a SetResult. Maybe what you want is a parameterized interface, something like class DeleteResult : EmptyResult<DeleteResult>

[oday]

I think separate interfaces will be just fine

[oday]

why convolute such a simple thing

[Youssef Shoaib [MOD]]

Oh yes parameterizing could do the trick here. Something like this:

sealed interface EmptyResult<R> {
  class Success<R> private constructor(): EmptyResult<R>
  class Failure<R>(val error: Throwable) : EmptyResult<R>
  companion object {
    private val successObject = Success<Nothing>()
    // Reified to prevent R from being Nothing
    inline fun <reified R> Success(): EmptyResult.Success<R> = successObject as Success<R>
  }
}
object DeleteResultType
object SetResultType
typealias DeleteResult = EmptyResult<DeleteResultType>
typealias SetResult = EmptyResult<SetResultType>

This should be typesafe and allow you to treat DeleteResult and SetResult as if they were there own thing, while ensuring that they're assignment-incompatible.