Is there any rhyme or reason to when inline classes are mapped to their underlying type in objective...

# multiplatform

[n8ebel]

Is there any rhyme or reason to when inline classes are mapped to their underlying type in objective-c versus being mapped to id?
For context, we’re trying to use an inline class as a non-null property in another DTO

This line in the interop doc seems to suggest it’s at least sometimes possible to represent as the underlying type

• inline classes (arguments are mapped as either underlying primitive type or id)

However, any implementation I’ve tried seems to result in a type of id being exposed in the XCFramework

[Paul Woitaschek]

I think it was somehow related to generics.

[Paul Woitaschek]

Our guidelines prohibit the usages of value classes in public API