A modern programming language that makes developers happier.

kotlinlang

Hi! Do you know the reason? Or I missed something?
<https://github.com/evant/kotlin-inject/issues/464>

Provider functions need to be annotated with `@Provides` and can't be abstract

I know. I need a way to get some instance from the component. And I want to configure instance's scope right in the component

So, I need an abstract function because what DI framework's sense is if I need to construct classes manually :slightly_smiling_face:

Change it to an `abstract val`. Then you don't need the `@Provides`, but you might still need the scope annotation (I don't remember 100% but I think if you don't scope it, it gets generated as a property without a backing field, but I might be wrong).

yes. it is how I did for now. but I don't want use scope annotations outside of the component description

Did you try putting the scope annotation on the `abstract val`?

Oh sorry, I missed what you're trying to do. That isn't supported, but I think it's supposed to log a warning saying so 

<https://github.com/evant/kotlin-inject/issues/238|https://github.com/evant/kotlin-inject/issues/238>

What's your use case for not wanting to put the scope annotation on the class?

1. i'd like to manage scopes in the component only
2. the same class instances with different lifecycles