Jan Skrasek
09/09/2025, 6:42 PMromainguy
09/09/2025, 6:47 PMJan Skrasek
09/09/2025, 7:21 PMromainguy
09/09/2025, 7:31 PMromainguy
09/09/2025, 7:32 PMshaz01
09/09/2025, 9:11 PMromainguy
09/09/2025, 9:55 PMDidier Villevalois
09/09/2025, 10:08 PMshaz01
09/09/2025, 10:34 PMromainguy
09/09/2025, 10:57 PMandylamax
09/09/2025, 11:06 PMromainguy
09/09/2025, 11:10 PMromainguy
09/09/2025, 11:10 PMsindrenm
09/10/2025, 9:07 AMromainguy
10/30/2025, 9:22 PMsindrenm
10/30/2025, 9:53 PMsindrenm
10/30/2025, 9:54 PMJan Skrasek
10/30/2025, 9:58 PMromainguy
10/31/2025, 7:55 PMAntoine Lamy
12/01/2025, 2:22 AMromainguy
12/01/2025, 2:38 AMAntoine Lamy
12/01/2025, 2:50 AMromainguy
12/01/2025, 2:52 AMNicolas Roard
12/01/2025, 2:54 AMNicolas Roard
12/01/2025, 3:08 AMAntoine Lamy
12/01/2025, 3:43 AMNicolas Roard
12/01/2025, 5:32 AMNicolas Roard
12/01/2025, 5:36 AMromainguy
12/01/2025, 5:36 AMNicolas Roard
12/01/2025, 5:37 AMNicolas Roard
12/01/2025, 5:37 AMNicolas Roard
12/01/2025, 5:38 AMgildor
12/01/2025, 6:20 AMAntoine Lamy
12/01/2025, 7:48 PMAntoine Lamy
12/01/2025, 7:51 PMremote-core and remote-player-core would need to be ported in order to run in non-JVM environments (in part at least), which makes the creation of an entirely new lib a little more complex to maintain over time if I'm getting this right. From what I've seen so far, if someone were to migrate these two modules over to Kotlin and substitute the main JVM dependencies to perhaps kotlinx-io and kotlinx-datetime, what would be stopping Android from using this implementation as well? The remote-player-view module could probably stay as a Java and Android only module. I thought the Kotlin-Java interop was good enough to not be constrained by the language in a scenario like this. BTW, is there a place where this desktop player might be available?Antoine Lamy
12/01/2025, 7:53 PMNicolas Roard
12/02/2025, 1:35 AMAmolJ
12/29/2025, 9:34 AM