:sweat_smile: I like the coincidence, as I already...

# naming

[Jonas]

😅 I like the coincidence, as I already had a naming question today.

We currently try to split up our composables into container (with viewmodel) and stateless view.
In this example the container is suffixed with Route - which I do not like. I also do not like to suffix the view with View - as this term is really overloaded on Android.

Any suggestions?

[Liudas Survila]

I do like https://bradfrost.com/blog/post/atomic-web-design/ I feel it fits nice declarative ui. Where Page/Screen is the real thing that takes in view model dependency. And Template that is reusable screen component you pass state from view model / preview / instrumentation tests, etc....

[Jonas]

@Liudas Survila thx for the response. That makes the question even more complex as we have our own library with the atomic design templates we then use in the view. 😉 Means: we reuse atomic design templates on multiple screens/views.

[Stylianos Gakis]

So what is it that makes the “Route” suffix not work for your case?
If your app is structured where each destination is a screen, and you can refer to it as a “route” it feels quite fitting and I wouldn’t try to give it a new name.
What makes you dislike the “Route” suffix by itself?

[Jonas]

We settled on the route suffix after an internal discussion. Thx again for the inputs.

[Pablichjenkov]

Route sounds good, I believe there is another navigation Library named "Conductor" that uses Route too.
I use Node suffix that contains a ScreenX. Each ScreenX receives its own ScreenXState.