Hey! Can someone confirm that <these> are the chan...
# testballoon
c
Hey! Can someone confirm that these are the changes required to support TestBalloon 1.0? I don't think anything else changed?
o
Looks good! If there are no other top-level suite invocations and no
displayName
parameters in lower-level test elements, you should be all set.
c
Each test passes a name, what changed about it?
Ah that's the regular name, not display name, so that's fine
1
Thanks! 🙏
kodee welcoming 1
o
The display name turned out to be a workaround for JUnit (use names from an annotation to work around Java identifier limitations). TestBalloon never really needed it.
👍 1