<https://www.forbes.com/sites/jasonbloomberg/2017/...

# random

[itnoles]

https://www.forbes.com/sites/jasonbloomberg/2017/07/20/the-low-codeno-code-movement-more-disruptive-than-you-realize/#7c45bb80722a 😞

[alex]

Developers invent libraries to reduce duplicated code, then developers invent frameworks to mimic typical flow/practices, then developers invent software which is abstracted enough to sell to different companies to cover their needs.
But then business decides one day that "it needs feature X", and it all becomes messy, to the point of no return, where you have to dump some other's software and hire people to write your own.
As far as I see it, it's not the issue of "there is no such product", but "we need to be able to customize and control software". This requirements comes not from developers ("who want to code") but from the business ("our needs are not satisfied by available products").

[codeslubber]

That article had nothing to say. Basically software is going to get a lot easier, and when it does, it will really disrupt all the enterprise dev shops. In other words: the disruption will be limited to a part of the market that is inherently non-disruptive and trailing edge. Great thanks….

[jimn]

no-code is ideal, if your problem can be dragged and dropped into a central metadata repository scheduling FSM's with ADT's. if you have any unit testing or customization last-mile needs at all, the consultants will be there with the proprietary knowledge, maybe building what you want, adding back the premium you saved in the first place.