finally, I cant wait! <https://github.com/Kotlin/K...
# randome
elect
07/31/2018, 1:12 PMfinally, I cant wait! https://github.com/Kotlin/KEEP/issues/142
👍 2
g
gildor
07/31/2018, 1:15 PMThis is just a proposal from someone from community, not an official one, I wouldn't be so excited.
But still it's much better to have a proposal than don't have it 😅
e
elect
07/31/2018, 1:17 PMhope-killer
k
karelpeeters
07/31/2018, 1:20 PMMissing bitwise inversion
~e
elect
07/31/2018, 2:00 PMare you gonna write that, Karel? Or shall I?
elect
07/31/2018, 2:25 PMI'll do
k
karelpeeters
07/31/2018, 2:26 PMDamm missed the first notification, thanks for adding it to the issue.
👍 1
n
napperley
08/01/2018, 1:40 AMBitwise operators are needed for just about anything involving a bit of low level development (serial programming, graphics programming, embedded development etc). A much better proposal (not yet in KEEP) is this one: https://github.com/Redrield/KEEP/blob/bitwise-operators/proposals/bitwise-operators.md
k
karelpeeters
08/01/2018, 1:42 AMThat's the same proposal?
n
napperley
08/01/2018, 1:48 AMIt is the same proposal. Looked like the proposal in the KEEP is different from the unofficial one 🙃 .
p
poohbar
08/01/2018, 1:34 PMHow does the proposal fix the precedence problem?
k
karelpeeters
08/01/2018, 1:35 PMBy having actual operators the parser will be able to actually give precedence to them?
2 Views