would it be possible to do something like this? ```fun interface A : suspend () -> Unit``` curren...

# announcements

[Marko Novakovic]

would it be possible to do something like this?

fun interface A : suspend () -> Unit

currently suspend is not allowed as a supertype

[LeoColman]

fun interface A {
    operator suspend fun invoke()  
}

[LeoColman]

Maybe something li ke this?

[ephemient]

yeah the first way is not a great idea, because suspend () -> Unit has the same erased type as (Continuation<*>) -> Unit. compiler uses an annotation to distinguish between suspend and non-suspend function types, but it can't be applied to your usage there.

[Marko Novakovic]

@LeoColman that’s how am doing it, just curious about inheriting suspend function

[Marko Novakovic]

@ephemient I understand, thanks