If I need to pass the current JVM class to a static method but I don't really have a class, is this the only way to do it? See image.

It there a specific reason for why you want your icons to be accessible on top-level? If not, maybe using an

object

could solve this problem and keep the top-level domain from being polluted.

@kralli not really a reason tbh. It's that I started that way and... we are here 😅

@kralli and I cannot change it as I have external dependencies on those.

So you’re using the top-level variables from Kotlin in a different module?

@kralli to be specific, that code comes from an IntelliJ plugin. And I have other plugins depending on those top level definitions (both Java and Kotlin)

That’s why I brought it up, though this does only apply to binary compatibility. In Kotlin it will obviously make a difference.

@kralli that's fine. I'll give this a try! Thanks!