Why does this discrepancy vs java exist? ``` class Bar : Foo<Quax>() abstract class Foo<...

# announcements

[ursus]

Why does this discrepancy vs java exist?

class Bar : Foo<Quax>() 

abstract class Foo<T>

internal class Quax

error is public subclass exposes internal supertype argument

and this java works

public class Rah extends Meh<Ohe> {
}

class Ohe {
}

public abstract class Meh<T> {
}

When internal is looser modifier than package private

[karelpeeters]

Don't post the same question is multiple channels, it just splits the discussion and it's not like #C0922A726 and #C0B8MA7FA have a lot of different people in them.

[ursus]

assumptions were wrong in that one, this is the clearest case

[karelpeeters]

You can edit comments as well.

[ursus]

Tbh this feels like a bug/uynexpected behaviour so more appropriate here