EDIT: nevermind, I'm an idiot, used the setter `fi...

# announcements

[Daniele Segato]

EDIT: nevermind, I'm an idiot, used the setter field, of course he force me to initialize

Why does the compiler force me to initialize a variable that is never actually read?

the get() doesn't ever expose the actual value of entries but if I do not include = null it complain with property must be initialized

I might be wrong but I kinda remember it didn't worked like that a couple of months ago (previous versions)

variable-example.kt

[wasyl]

Aren’t you accessing the field in if (actual != field)?

[wasyl]

If you don’t initialize it inline and call the setter, you’d have to compare with an uninitialized field

[Daniele Segato]

nevermind, I'm an idiot 😄

i used the field = actual

[Daniele Segato]

thanks for taking the time to answer me @wasyl