Inside a `with (foo)` block, is there any way to i...

# announcements

[mathew murphy]

Inside a with (foo) block, is there any way to indicate that I mean variable bar from outside the block, rather than a property bar of object foo?

[bloder]

[e-mail]?

[LeoColman]

this seems confusing tho

[mathew murphy]

Yes, it works, but it doesn't look elegant.

[mathew murphy]

Maybe the right answer is not to use with

[gildor]

I agree, if nested scope usage become confusion I would just get rid of this scope and use explicit name instead

[gildor]

I would also say that I almost never use with itself (tho I use similar run and apply extensions)