The interface

KFunction1

declares the parameter name, it can therefore not technically be different. Parameter names of lambda types might be a future feature, perhaps.

Then the question is, what do you mean by usages? Callers of

example

or

f

I mean the callers of

f

, the reason I want to do this is to improve readability of library code. If I have to do it manually I probably still will but it'll suck

If there is another way to achieve the same goal that'd be as good but if so is there a point in naming lambda params from a library point of view?

So the callers of

f

are all inside the

example

function right.

I dont think theres a point beyond clarity

So no point for a library to do this? Or will IDEA still suggest the param name based on the Metadata?