The problem seems to be that too many things are i...
# announcementsl
LeoColman
03/15/2019, 10:31 PMThe problem seems to be that too many things are inlined, but I need that many things inlined
r
Ruckus
03/15/2019, 10:42 PMbut I need that many things inlinedWhy?
l
LeoColman
03/15/2019, 10:49 PMI need the function to work both in suspend context and non-suspend context
LeoColman
03/15/2019, 10:49 PM(the high-order function)
LeoColman
03/15/2019, 10:50 PMAnd I don't want to create a suspended alternative
r
Ruckus
03/15/2019, 10:58 PMThat sounds... wrong. I'm guessing you have a serious XY problem, but I could be wrong.
l
LeoColman
03/15/2019, 10:59 PMOk, I'll try to explain the problem
r
Ruckus
03/15/2019, 10:59 PMYou may do better in #C1CFAFJSK.
l
LeoColman
03/15/2019, 10:59 PMGiven function
fun foo(boo: () -> Unit) { }LeoColman
03/15/2019, 10:59 PMI want to call
foo { suspendBoo() }foo { nonSuspendBoo() }LeoColman
03/15/2019, 11:00 PMBut if I let
booboo: suspend () -> UnitLeoColman
03/15/2019, 11:04 PMOr will it.... Hmm
r
Ruckus
03/15/2019, 11:04 PMThe second case works just fine. I just tried it. I'm guessing you have some other problem going on
Ruckus
03/15/2019, 11:05 PMA suspending function can run non-suspending code. It would be pretty useless if it couldn't.
l
LeoColman
03/15/2019, 11:07 PMMy original problem is that I want to run on the current suspend scope if I'm inside one, but outside it if I'm not
r
Ruckus
03/15/2019, 11:52 PMYou probably want to ask in #C1CFAFJSK then
l
LeoColman
03/16/2019, 12:06 AMty 😄