have <https://gist.github.com/andrewgazelka/63b866...
# announcements
a
pretty sure this is a bug... anyway I can work around this?
uggg can't think of a good way to do recursive for loops
without this
i
If you have a stable reproducer, please file a bug
Perhaps it is this issue: https://youtrack.jetbrains.com/issue/KT-28208. There's a workaround with specifying function return type explicitly.