there isnt a way to have `inline` within `interfac...
# announcementse
elect
10/12/2018, 9:41 AMthere isnt a way to have
inlineinterfaceonly private or final methods can have it
k
karelpeeters
10/12/2018, 9:42 AMHow would that work? The compiler needs to know the actual implementation.
e
elect
10/12/2018, 9:42 AMI'd be fine if I could declare it as final
e
Egor Trutenko
10/12/2018, 9:43 AMYou basically can't declare
interfacefinale
elect
10/12/2018, 9:44 AMexactly, so there is no way, isn't?
e
elizarov
10/12/2018, 9:44 AMYou can write an extension function on your interface.
👍 2
e
Egor Trutenko
10/12/2018, 9:45 AMTo clarify, why do you actually need to declare an interface method
inlinee
elect
10/12/2018, 9:49 AMfor performances and since I have a lambda in the arguments it makes sense
e
Egor Trutenko
10/12/2018, 9:53 AMNo it doesn't. Should your call with lambda be inlined or not depends on implementation of that method
e
elect
10/12/2018, 10:02 AMthat's the thing, I don't want implement that method
elect
10/12/2018, 10:03 AMI'm perfectly fine with the common base method
e
Egor Trutenko
10/12/2018, 10:14 AMI don't understand. So you have an interface with default implementation that you don't want to override and which operates on abstract properties of that interface, right?
e
elect
10/12/2018, 10:21 AM Copy code
abstract class GLCanvas {
...
@Throws(AWTException::class)
abstract fun lock()
@Throws(AWTException::class)
abstract fun unlock()
@Throws(AWTException::class)
inline fun <R> lock(block: () -> R): R =
try {
lock()
block()
} finally {
unlock()
}
}k
karelpeeters
10/12/2018, 10:22 AMYou can just make that an extension function.
e
elect
10/12/2018, 10:22 AM.. yes
elect
10/12/2018, 10:23 AMyeah, I know, I tried and worked flawless. However I found that I also have a common property.. that's why I switched to
abstract classk
karelpeeters
10/12/2018, 11:35 AM...
e
elect
10/12/2018, 12:17 PMeh sorry 😄
2 Views