And without a double lazy implementation!
# announcementsk
karelpeeters
04/04/2018, 3:50 PMAnd without a double lazy implementation!
u
ubu
04/04/2018, 3:51 PMYou mean without Provider abstract class?
k
karelpeeters
04/04/2018, 3:52 PMNo, the code you linked implemts a lazy getter, and then uses
lazykarelpeeters
04/04/2018, 3:52 PMI can't figure out why he would do something like that.