I don't really think that's better though.
# announcementsk
karelpeeters
09/12/2017, 9:42 AMI don't really think that's better though.
g
gildor
09/12/2017, 9:45 AMRoughly looks like more efficient, because less allocations, only one list object instead of IntRange + List
j
jstuyts-squins
09/12/2017, 10:10 AMAnd 300 invocations of a lamba. A range might have a more efficient way to convert itself to a list. Haven't checked though
k
karelpeeters
09/12/2017, 10:12 AMThat's inline, right? No lambda actually exists at runtime.
g
gildor
09/12/2017, 10:14 AM@jstuyts-squins This lambda is inlined, in bytecode and on runtime you will have ArrayList and int loop
j
jstuyts-squins
09/12/2017, 12:15 PMGreat, but
List(300) { it }Array(300) { it }k
karelpeeters
09/12/2017, 12:20 PMWhat do you mean "doesn't work"? It works for me, what version of Kotlin are you on?
g
gildor
09/12/2017, 12:24 PM@jstuyts-squins Works perfectly - https://try.kotlinlang.org/#/UserProjects/ja3te7p41bavd5jk1l2q24sk56/9fcvq4126gbh5ttm2vjdksl99s
maybe you use Kotlin 1.0.* instead of 1.1
j
jstuyts-squins
09/12/2017, 1:58 PMSorry for the confusion. It seems try.kotlinlang.org decided to lower the language version