diesieben0709/03/2017, 12:15 PM
, which makes no sense here, the arguments passed in to my methods were perfectly fine.
ilya.gorbunov09/03/2017, 4:42 PM
diesieben0709/03/2017, 6:11 PM
, which is the most reasonable thing you can do, I think.
ilya.gorbunov09/03/2017, 9:09 PM
— when the returned value doesn't meet the function contract.
diesieben0709/03/2017, 9:34 PM
here, since that seems to be only for the
dagguh09/05/2017, 6:39 AM
. Do you have a exception-type-specific try-catch logic? Limit the
scope and you’ll know what failed on your abstraction level. Or use return values instead of data-carrying exceptions. Do you want the exception to explain the error? Let the exception message and stacktrace do it for you.
diesieben0709/05/2017, 1:37 PM
would do. It's just that
are not appropriate, just like