I don't like code like this in `RecyclerView`'s `A...

# announcements

[mg6maciej]

I don't like code like this in `RecyclerView`'s Adapter tho. Prefer to have each case as a class.

[Paul Woitaschek]

What do you mean by that? Can you give an example?

[mg6maciej]

I usually notice threads, but didn't this time 🙂

[mg6maciej]

Yet...

[mg6maciej]

So to answer your question: I have made a very simple abstraction layer called ItemAdapter, which looks like https://github.com/elpassion/android-commons/blob/develop/recycler/src/main/java/com/elpassion/android/commons/recycler/components/base/ItemAdapter.kt

[mg6maciej]

You could not find my original idea in that code anymore, cause my ex-coworkers changed it too much since then, but to complete this ItemAdapter there was BaseRecyclerViewAdapter, which had a list of `ItemAdapter`s and would delegate all work to item at position.

[mg6maciej]

Blame @kasper.kondzielski @karolkowalski @jozzi @langara or whoever for making (or allowing to make) it too complex 😉

[Paul Woitaschek]

I don't get it. When do you bind the actual data?

[mg6maciej]

Actual data is passed as constructor argument to subclasses of ItemAdapter.

[langara]

I've removed ItemAdapters - now it's simpler 😛