Seems a bit odd that the kotlin-css <flex> function behaves differently from <the flexbox spec> in t...

# javascript

[Rescribet]

Seems a bit odd that the kotlin-css flex function behaves differently from the flexbox spec in that omitting basis defaults to FlexBasis.auto rather than FlexBasis.none

// CSS
flex: 1;

// Kotlin
flex(1.0) // Different
flex(1.0, basis = FlexBasis.none) // same

Noticed this since I didn’t understand why my colleague used put("flex", "1") over flex(1.0)

[turansky]

Direct analog:
flexGrow = 1.0 ?

[turansky]

Also grow extension available

[Rescribet]

That might be true, but this will probably cause a lot of confusion and delay downstream