Shouldn't there be a function with following signature? `StateFlow<T>.map(.....) : StateFlow&l...

# android

[Ashu]

Shouldn't there be a function with following signature?
StateFlow<T>.map(.....) : StateFlow<R>

Since the mapping flow is a state flow it should already have an initial value right? Then why not just map it directly to a state flow? And if I wish to define such an extension function, how should I do that?

[Albert Chang]

https://github.com/Kotlin/kotlinx.coroutines/issues/2631

[Ashu]

Oh thank you @Albert Chang