whats the difference between these two ways of ins...

# android

[Tim]

whats the difference between these two ways of instantiating a string?

[joeykaan]

stringy2 actually has the type of optional string right, while stringy1 is a String, so it would make working with the stringy1 easier

[Rob Murdock]

The first variable will infer its type, which will be “String” (aka the non-nullable version)

The second has to have it declared, and because the type is String?, will require null checks in order to use

[Tim]

ohh okay thats not what i was expected, i was actually asking in regards to when/how they are instantiated. like, are they done at the same time? i know java doesnt have the init method as far as im aware so im just curious what it does/when i should be concerned with it

[gian]

They are instantiated in order of appearance

[joeykaan]

If you're using Android Studio (which I assume you are) if you go to Tools > Kotlin > Show Kotlin Bytecode and then check the IR checkbox and then Decompile again

[joeykaan]

You can see the java code that is generated 🙂, that might help you to see the difference (if any)

[Tim]

oh sick! thank you

[Paul Woitaschek]

You can also make stringy2 not nullable and initialize it in the init block

[Alowaniak]

Java has initializers, which can be static or not.
The non static ones are pretty much the same as kotlin's init afaik.