`<https://github.com/greenrobot/EventBus>` =&gt; 2 years without update =&gt; Do you think it dead? ...

# android

[Sam]

<https://github.com/greenrobot/EventBus> => 2 years without update => Do you think it dead? Or anything can do the same things EventBus but written on pure Kotlin ???

[gildor]

why do you need eventbus at all?

[Sam]

to get rid out of Callback Hell …

[Akbar]

@Sam you can try RX java2

[gildor]

eventbus is like callback hell + events hell

[Sam]

Im using EventBus instead Callback hell..

[Akbar]

please try Rx Java you will love it

[gildor]

I mean this project is dead with good reason, because EventBus is quite nasty pattern imo

[gildor]

Or kotlinx.coroutines Flow after all, you just starting your project

[Sam]

eventbus is like callback hell + events hell => but how do you get rid out of call back hello such as onClick in view holder to send something to activity or fragment ????

[Sam]

kotlinx.coroutines => Im using rxkotlin, do you think coroutines better than rxkotlin?

[gildor]

rxkotlin is just a bunch extensions to make RxJava better to use from Kotlin

[gildor]

So it means that you already have RxJava

[gildor]

I love Flow, but I also use RxJava, so I wouldn’t say that I recommend to use one instead of another

[Sam]

@Akbar Herlambang: Im using Rxkotlin , but I want to find the way to simplify to avoid rewrite too much callback hell.

[gildor]

I mean events bus probably can simplify it in a same way how you can simplify code by using static global state or singletones

[gildor]

but price of this simplification is too high imo

[Sam]

@gildor: Do you have any idea to send some Object from view holder to fragment/activity ?

[gildor]

For such things as view holder I just usually do opposite, pass some lambda to view holder that will be called, and this lambda created on activity/fragment

[Sam]

Please give me some example or link to do that things.
p.s: u mean using Unit ()

[gildor]

no I mean () -> Unit

[gildor]

I mean just pass some callback to viewholder which then will be called

[Sam]

ohm ok, I got it, Thank @gildor