When should I use `sealed interface` or `sealed cl...

# getting-started

[Jason5lee]

When should I use sealed interface or sealed class?

[Luke]

My rule of thumb is to always use a sealed interface unless I need a constructor in the sealed class

[Alejandro Rios]

Most common use of a sealed class is to handle the states of a response Failure/Success/Loading

[ephemient]

sealed interface doesn't work with @Serializable at present, so I still default to sealed class unless there is a particular structure that can only be expressed as sealed interface

[andylamax]

As @ephemient said, My go to approach is a sealed interface, unless I want to serialize then, I fallback to sealed class

[ephemient]

that's the opposite of what I said :P

[ephemient]

but that works too

[ephemient]

https://github.com/Kotlin/kotlinx.serialization/issues/1576 is supposed to be fixed in Kotlin 1.6.20 so hopefully this won't be a necessary consideration in the future

[Stephan Schroeder]

another nice property of sealed interface is that its implementing classes can be data classes, which is why sealed interfaces is my default. (good to know about the serializable restriction!)

[ephemient]

data class can subclass (sealed) classes too, that's not a distinction

[Łukasz Gendek]

with sealed interfaces the multi inheritance is allowed

[ephemient]

yes, that would be the "unless there isa particular structure that can only be expressed as a `sealed interface`" in my previous message. but ultimately it's a mostly stylistic choice if you're not interoperating with Java