Hi, If use a 3rd party library, like lets say moshi, and I create useful extensions, and useful columnadapters etc, and want to distribute this to other consumers (internally). How should I name this module? Is the X suffix common place in kotlin in user space as well?

:moshix

? or more conservative

:base-moshi

? (

:sqdelightx

,

:retrofitx

etc) same goes for my custom

Flow

operators, since flow likes to keep it bare bones

foox

usually implies that you own

foo

,

yourlibrary-otherlibrary

is common, but there are as many opinions on this as stars in the universe

so how would you name the example,

ext-moshi

?

moshi-utils

?

Probably something like

yourlibraryname-moshi

or something 🤷‍♂️

Google's approach in Android libraries is to use

libraryname-ktx

AFAICT, but as @Adam Powell said it sort of implies you own the lib.

Our use of

-ktx

is highly specific and only indicates converting the "host" library's existing APIs to more idiomatic kotlin usage, not adding new features

Well, this is actually how I had understood the OP's usage: useful extensions being Kotlin adaptations of otherwise Java-like API, but upon reading I may be wrong - it looks like it may be about adding features as well. If that's the case then naming should be based on the features you are adding, so there is no real question of

x

,

ext

or the likes.